Roger Williams University School of Law

10 Metacom Ave, Bristol, RI 02809
School / Childcare
License: Food Service (Non-Profit)
Last inspected: Nov 20, 2025
70
Score
Medium Risk

Roger Williams University School of Law has a thin inspection record, with only two visits on file so far. The most recent report on file is from Nov 20, 2025. Medium risk typically reflects a handful of issues that inspectors wrote up but didn't deem critical.

Violation counts have held steady across recent visits, averaging around two violations each.

Across the inspection history, “non-food contact surfaces clean” is the issue that surfaces most often, recorded two times.

By comparison, the average Bristol facility scores 85, putting Roger Williams University School of Law on the weaker side. On the whole, the file is mixed but not concerning.

2
Inspections
2
Critical latest
0
Major latest
1
Minor latest
Inspection History
Nov 20, 2025
Routine
2 critical violations. 1 minor violation. 2 corrected on site.
View 3 violations
Hot or cold food held at improper temperature (corrected on site)
Inspector notes: Home-fry potatoes were observed held at 130 degrees Fahrenheit on the flat-top griddle. Time/temperature control for safety (TCS) food must be maintained at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or above except during preparation, cooking, or cooling. Food items were voluntarily disposed of during the time of inspection.
3-501.16(A)
Expired or improperly marked ready-to-eat food not discarded (corrected on site)
Inspector notes: Chipotle mayo and garlic aioli prepared on-site were observed held past their disposition date. Any food items prepared within the establishment shall follow a seven-day date mark including the day of preparation and shall be disposed of after the seventh day. Food items were voluntarily disposed of during the time of inspection.
3-501.18
Equipment or utensils not clean
Inspector notes: The non-food contact surfaces of the ice machine and the walk-in cooler fan guards have an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris. Non-food contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to prevent the accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris.
4-601.11(B)
70
Dec 4, 2024
Routine
2 minor violations.
View 2 violations
Outer openings not protected against pests
Inspector notes: The door to the outside, located in the back entrance of kitchen and the double doors to the outside, are not tight-fitting. Outer openings of a food establishment must be protected against the entry of insects and rodents by tight-fitting doors.
6-202.15
Equipment or utensils not clean
Inspector notes: The non-food contact surfaces of the walk-in cooler fan guards and the air curtains have an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris. Non-food contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to prevent the accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris.
4-601.11(B)
90

Frequently Asked Questions

When was Roger Williams University School of Law last inspected?

The most recent health inspection at Roger Williams University School of Law on file is from Nov 20, 2025. The public record contains two inspections in total.

What is the most common violation at Roger Williams University School of Law?

Across the inspection record, “non-food contact surfaces clean” has been cited two times, more than any other issue at Roger Williams University School of Law.

How does Roger Williams University School of Law compare to other restaurants in Bristol?

Roger Williams University School of Law most recently scored 70 out of 100, which is lower than the Bristol average of 85.

Has Roger Williams University School of Law's inspection record improved over time?

Results have been roughly steady. Inspections at Roger Williams University School of Law have averaged around two violations per visit across the recent record.

What does a medium risk rating mean?

A medium risk rating at Roger Williams University School of Law means the most recent inspection turned up a handful of issues that the health department wrote up but did not classify as critical.