Julio G's / Julio's Too
Last inspected: Feb 25, 2026
86
Score
Public records show seven inspections at Julio G's / Julio's Too stretching back to 2024. The latest inspection on file is from Feb 25, 2026. A low risk tier reflects an inspection that turned up minimal issues.
Violation counts have held steady across recent visits, averaging around one violation each.
The most common issue across all inspections has been “certified food protection manager”, showing up two times.
Restaurants in Phoenix average 97, so Julio G's / Julio's Too trails the local norm. Overall, the inspection record reads well.
7
Inspections
0
Critical latest
1
Major latest
1
Minor latest
Inspection History
Feb 25, 2026
Routine
1 major violation. 1 minor violation. 1 corrected on site.
View 2 violations
Improper cooling methods used
(corrected on site)
Inspector notes: Observed salsa with TCS cut tomatoes 57*F-60*F in 20 gallon bin cooling in the walk-in at the time of inspection. Also observed meat broth 107*F in a uncovered pot deeper than 4" cooling in the walk-in cooler. TCS foods must be cooled in: uncovered/loosely covered, shallow containers less than 4 inches deep, in equipment designed to rapidly cool, by using an ice bath, by using ice as an ingredient, or another effective means. Per PIC, salsa was made three hours prior to the time of inspection and broth was made less than an hour prior to inspection. All TCS foods being cooled in deep containers were transferred to shallow containers to allow for rapid cooling
3-501.15(A)
Food-contact surfaces not cleaned and sanitized at required frequency
Inspector notes: Observed build up of dark organic matter on soda nozzle gun at the bar, on the soda fountain nozzles, and on the shoot of the ice machine at the time of inspection. In equipment such as ice bins and beverage dispensing nozzles and enclosed components of equipment such as ice makers, they must be cleaned at a frequency specified by the manufacturer, or absent manufacturer specifications, at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil or organic matter
4-602.11(E)
86
Dec 22, 2025
Food Advisory Inspection
No violations found.
100
Nov 7, 2025
Routine
1 minor violation. 1 corrected on site.
View 1 violation
Outer openings not protected against pests
(corrected on site)
Inspector notes: Observed two roll up garage doors and two doors open from the outside to the restaurant at the time of inspection. Outer openings of a food establishment shall be protected against the entry of insects and rodents by: closed, tight-fitting windows; and solid, self-closing, tight-fitting doors. PIC closed doors at the time of inspection. Provided handout for protection of outer openings at the time of inspection
6-202.15
95
Jun 18, 2025
Routine
1 critical violation. 1 corrected on site.
View 1 violation
Conveying Sewage
(corrected on site)
Inspector notes: Observed outside back of establishment grease trap to be overflowing onto back parking lot. Per PIC, grease trap was emptied day prior and overflow was from dishwashing machine - no grease was observed on ground. Per PIC, plumber had already been scheduled to come snake drain the following morning - had PIC call for plumber to come out during inspection. PIC stopped running dishwashing machine and stated they would not run it again until plumber snaked drain. Grease trap stopped overflowing after dishwashing machine was stopped; plumber arrived to snake drain during time of inspection. Discussed proper disposal of sewage and procedures for when overflow occurs
5-402.13
86
Feb 20, 2025
Routine
1 critical violation. 1 corrected on site.
View 1 violation
Conveying Sewage
(corrected on site)
Inspector notes: Observed floor drain next to chest freezer to not be draining, causing disposed mop water to overflow onto the floor. Reviewed with PIC proper disposal of mop water. PIC was able to unclog floor drain during time of inspection
5-402.13
86
Oct 1, 2024
Routine
2 minor violations. 1 corrected on site.
View 2 violations
Improper cooling methods used
(corrected on site)
Inspector notes: Observed trays of chimichangas and flautas in the process of cooling in the reach-in cooler stacked directly on top of each other as to prevent circulation of air in the cooler. Discussed with PIC ensuring items are stored in coolers staggered on separate shelves to encourage better air flow and faster cooling. Ensure two-door reach-in cooler is not overfilled to encourage circulation. PIC rearranged items and moved them to other cooling units at time of inspection
3-501.15(B)
No certified food protection manager
Inspector notes: No Certified Food Protection Manager (CFPM) was present at the establishment during time of inspection. PIC said they scheduled a CFPM exam for 10/12. A Certified Food Protection Manager is required to be on the premises during all hours of operation
2-102.12(A)
90
Jul 18, 2024
Routine
1 major violation. 1 minor violation. 1 corrected on site.
View 2 violations
Ready-to-eat food not date marked
(corrected on site)
Inspector notes: Observed in the walk-in cooler containers of cooked chicken and a tray of cooked pork without date marks. Per PIC, the chicken and pork were prepared two days prior. PIC properly date marked all RTE/TCS foods at the time of inspection. Discussed with PIC that RTE/TCS foods requiring date marking must be date marked within 24 hours and sold or discarded after 7 days (including the day it was made as day 1)
3-501.17
No certified food protection manager
Inspector notes: No Certified Food Protection Manager was present at the establishment. A Certified Food Protection Manager (CFPM) is required to be on the premises during all hours of operation. PIC signed up for a CFPM class for the following month
2-102.12(A)
86
Frequently Asked Questions
When was Julio G's / Julio's Too last inspected?
The most recent health inspection at Julio G's / Julio's Too on file is from Feb 25, 2026. The public record contains seven inspections in total.
What is the most common violation at Julio G's / Julio's Too?
Across the inspection record, “certified food protection manager” has been cited two times, more than any other issue at Julio G's / Julio's Too.
How does Julio G's / Julio's Too compare to other restaurants in Phoenix?
Julio G's / Julio's Too most recently scored 86 out of 100, which is lower than the Phoenix average of 97.
Has Julio G's / Julio's Too's inspection record improved over time?
Results have been roughly steady. Inspections at Julio G's / Julio's Too have averaged around one violation per visit across the recent record.
What does a low risk rating mean?
A low risk rating at Julio G's / Julio's Too means inspectors found minimal or no significant issues at the most recent visit. Most facilities at this tier have a clean recent inspection report.
How often is Julio G's / Julio's Too inspected?
Based on the inspection history on file, Julio G's / Julio's Too is inspected around four times per year on average.
Nearby Restaurants