Las Palmas Food Trucks

2027 Broad St, Augusta, GA 30904
Mexican / Latin
License: Food Service
Last inspected: Mar 10, 2026
74
Score
Medium Risk

Inspectors have visited Las Palmas Food Trucks three times, with records going back to 2025. The latest inspection on file is from Mar 10, 2026. Medium risk typically reflects a handful of issues that inspectors wrote up but didn't deem critical.

Performance has remained roughly level over recent inspections, averaging near two violations each time.

The most common issue across all inspections has been “food separated and protected”, showing up two times.

Restaurants in Augusta average 89, so Las Palmas Food Trucks trails the local norm. The record is unremarkable in either direction.

3
Inspections
2
Critical latest
0
Major latest
0
Minor latest
Inspection History
Mar 10, 2026
Routine
2 critical violations. 1 corrected on site.
View 2 violations
4-1A - food separated and protected
Inspector notes: Observed incorrect storage of food in reach-in-cooler. Observed raw beef and pork stored next to cooked food, raw beef stored on top of raw chicken, and raw shrimp stored next to raw beef and raw chicken. C/A: Store food according to internal cooking temperature: ready to eat food, seafood, beef and pork, and chicken.
511-6-1.04(4)(c)
6-1A - proper cold holding temperatures (corrected on site)
Inspector notes: Observed rice and pork sitting on countertop with temperatures of 91 degrees Fahrenheit and 96 degrees Fahrenheit in kitchen. COS- food was reheated to 202 degrees Fahrenheit and 168 degrees Fahrenheit C/A: Active cooling starts at 135 degrees Fahrenheit. Monitor temperatures to prevent bacterial growth.
511-6-1.04(6)(f)
74
Sep 19, 2025
Routine
1 major violation. 3 minor violations.
View 4 violations
2-2D - adequate handwashing facilities supplied & accessible
Inspector notes: Observed no soap at the hand washing sink in the main kitchen. C/A: Ensure all hand washing sinks are fully supplied at all times.
511-6-1.07(3)(a)
11D - thermometers provided and accurate
Inspector notes: Observed several coolers and freezers without thermometers. C/A: Place thermometers in the warmest part of all coolers and freezers.
511-6-1.05(2)(x)
14A - in-use utensils: properly stored
Inspector notes: Observed scoops improperly stored inside rice and flour. C/A: Ensure scoops are properly stored with handle above the food and container.
511-6-1.04(4)(k)
14B - utensils, equipment and linens: properly stored, dried, handled
Inspector notes: Observed wet nesting of clean dishes. C/A: Allow dishes to properly air dry before stacking.
511-6-1.05(10)(a)
78
Jul 18, 2025
Initial
2 minor violations.
View 2 violations
4-2A - food stored covered
Inspector notes: Observed several food items stored uncovered inside the coolers & dry storage area. C/A: Store all food items covered.
511-6-1.04(4)(c)
18 - insects, rodents, and animals not present
Inspector notes: Observed flies throughout the establishment. C/A: Consult with a licensed PCO to get rid of the flies. Keep doors/windows closed when possible.
511-6-1.07(5)(k)
90

Frequently Asked Questions

When was Las Palmas Food Trucks last inspected?

The most recent health inspection at Las Palmas Food Trucks on file is from Mar 10, 2026. The public record contains three inspections in total.

What is the most common violation at Las Palmas Food Trucks?

Across the inspection record, “food separated and protected” has been cited two times, more than any other issue at Las Palmas Food Trucks.

How does Las Palmas Food Trucks compare to other restaurants in Augusta?

Las Palmas Food Trucks most recently scored 74 out of 100, which is lower than the Augusta average of 89.

Has Las Palmas Food Trucks' inspection record improved over time?

Results have been roughly steady. Inspections at Las Palmas Food Trucks have averaged around two violations per visit across the recent record.

What does a medium risk rating mean?

A medium risk rating at Las Palmas Food Trucks means the most recent inspection turned up a handful of issues that the health department wrote up but did not classify as critical.